文章 星期四 12th 4 月 2018

No such thing as a free delivery

Consumer expectations of delivery continue their relentless march: speed of fulfilment is now rated by 8% of US consumers as the most important factor in e-commerce decisions, up from 2% in 2017, according to Kibo.

Unfortunately, consumers have been conditioned to expect their delivery for free. But as with lunch, so with delivery: there’s no such thing as free. So who has been paying for it? And who will in the future?

Initially, retailers paid: the first movers drove conversion with free delivery. Then retailers used free delivery to drive basket size. But now it is ubiquitous, the costs of offering it are starting to really hurt retailer profits.

The other party who paid for free delivery was, perversely, the delivery driver, despite the boom in parcel delivery. Labor accounts for 3/4 of delivery cost, so the squeeze was inevitable, especially as legacy unionized workforces allowed new entrants to undercut on price. But more recent labor cost reduction has been achieved by a significant worsening in working conditions, including the rise of self-employment, some of which have been found to be exploitative. We don’t think costs can go lower, and they may even increase as labor regulations tighten. So until the drones take off, further cost efficiencies in delivery aren’t going to support free.

What next then for free delivery? Retailers and logistics companies are battling to find new sustainable models:

  • Driving lock-in through subscription models – Prime, obviously, but others such as Tesco, ASOS and Next in the UK are increasingly pushing unlimited delivery options. This clearly poses a challenge to smaller retailers, so…
  • Partnerships to challenge Prime – for example, in same day/overnight, Google Express in the US. How long before traditional postal/parcel services offer a retailer-agnostic version of Prime?
  • A mindset shift from order- to customer-profitability – delivery is a core part of retailer proposition, and is as much about brand experience as fulfilling a specific purchase. The best retailers are already thinking this way but the systems and cultural shift this requires can still feel like a mountain to climb
  • Make the customer pay: either building delivery into the item pricing, as is already starkly apparent on eBay/Marketplace, undermining consumer trust in free. Or more interestingly, as an explicit cost – can retailers mitigate the conversion hit from charging, by majoring on transparency and trust, like Everlane?

Free delivery won’t disappear completely, but it’s clear the retailer and the logistics worker can’t subsidise it any further. Which ultimately leaves us: consumers.

主要联系人

Nic

Nic

Partner

建议性文章

查看所有文章

星期四 19th 6 月 2025

Fashion Forward: Winning in India’s Fast-Growth Apparel Market

India's apparel sector is forecast to grow at a rapid 10–12% CAGR from 2024 to 2030, making it one of the fastest-growing large-scale markets...
阅读文章

星期二 29th 4 月 2025

循环经济浪潮至,品牌与零售商如何应对?

如何将循环理念融入业务内核,并转化为可持续的商业模式,已成为企业构建长期竞争力的关键。
阅读文章

星期二 29th 4 月 2025

下沉市场机遇何在?

本文旨在深入剖析低线市场发展动态,从经济环境、渠道变革、消费趋势等多个关键维度入手,探析低线市场的独特性与复杂性,为企业提供具有前瞻性的洞察与建议。
阅读文章

星期一 7th 4 月 2025

Reclaiming the Profit Pool – How Retailers are Fighting Back on Profit Pressure

Retailers in the UK have been contending with a steadily shrinking profit pool for the past decade - and must act quickly to reclaim...
阅读文章

星期一 24th 3 月 2025

Second-Hand Fashion: How First-Hand Brands can Compete and Thrive

Recent years have seen accelerated growth in the resale market, with particular focus on growth in online channels - first-hand brands must take notice...
阅读文章